California: California Supreme Court

May 18, 2009 - 08:30 am

Fasten Your Seatbelts

by Kate Kendell Executive Director National Center for Lesbian Rights Friday marked the one year anniversary of the California Supreme Court’s groundbreaking ruling striking down the exclusion of same-sex couples from the right to marry. On the morning of May 15, 2008 I stood on the Supreme Court steps—with hundreds...

April 23, 2009 - 08:03 pm

Is California Supreme Court seriously considering scrapping Prop. 209?

Maybe. It upheld 209 in 2001. But look at the court cases it asked Jerry Brown to consider before offering his opinion as to whether Proposition 209 was an unconstitutional violation of the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution:...

March 26, 2009 - 12:40 pm
NEWS FEED: CA Political News

Plan to Repeal Prop. 8 Introduced

As expected, the Left does not take to democracy.  In 2000 the people of California passed Prop. 22 to disallow same sex marriage.  In 2008 the people of California passed Prop. 8, to disallow same sex marriage and put it in the State Constitution.

The Left sues the people of California, the unqualified Attorney General, who is supposed to represent the People, instead represents the nasty anti-democratic special interests and joins them in the court suit against the People of California.

That lawsuit is about to be thrown out by the California Supreme Court.  So, the radical Left decides to create a ballot measure for the June, 2010 ballot, to overturn two ballot measures and several court rulings.

To them, this is a game.  Shame on them for abusing the process--but what else would you expect from Chavez/Castro type totalitarians, integrity?

March 6, 2009 - 03:00 am
NEWS FEED: Los Angeles Times

California Supreme Court looks unlikely to kill Proposition 8

Reporting from San Francisco -- The California Supreme Court strongly indicated Thursday it would rule that Proposition 8 validly abolished the right for gays to marry but would allow same-sex couples who wed before the November election to remain legally married.

The long-awaited hearing, which came as dueling demonstrators chanted and carried banners outside, was a disappointment for gay rights lawyers.

They had hoped the same court majority that overturned the state's previous marriage ban would conclude that Proposition 8 was an impermissible constitutional revision.

Two members of that majority -- Chief Justice Ronald M. George and Justice Joyce L. Kennard -- expressed deep skepticism toward the gay rights lawyers' arguments.

March 6, 2009 - 03:00 am
NEWS FEED: Los Angeles Times

Loudly and colorfully, opposing sides debate Proposition 8

Reporting from San Francisco -- God was in the eye of the beholder Thursday morning at the San Francisco Civic Center Plaza, where hundreds of spectators gathered to watch the California Supreme Court on a massive outdoor TV screen and wrangle over the sanctity of marriage.

The occasion: Attorneys from both sides of the gay-marriage debate were arguing the merits -- or demerits -- of Proposition 8, the November ballot measure that banned same-sex marriage in California. The dress code: dreadlocks, nose rings, rabbit costumes, clerical collars, wedding veils, hair colors not found in nature (and some that were), rainbow stripes, American flags, suits.

March 5, 2009 - 03:52 pm
NEWS FEED: Calitics

Prop 8 Post-Arguments Open Thread

The oral arguments in the effort to overturn Prop 8 ended about a half hour ago, and the hearing has made some things clear, even though final outcome remains uncertain.

Queerty has a good overview of the seven justices that will decide the case and their general political leanings. Much of this was confirmed by what I could see in the oral arguments.

There seem to be two main questions at play here. First, will Prop 8 be upheld? Based on the arguments I would tentatively posit the court will rule this way:

Overturn: George, Moreno, Werdegar
Uphold: Baxter, Chin, Kennard
Unclear: Corrigan

Kennard ruled with the majority last May on the marriage cases, but as the day went on it became clear she does not buy the "Prop 8 was a revision, not an amendment" argument.

March 4, 2009 - 09:56 pm
NEWS FEED: Sacramento Bee

AM Alert: Feinstein, Whitman atop early 2010 poll

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, should she run for governor in 2010, would be sitting pretty, with a 22-point lead in the latest Field Poll.

On the Republican side, Meg Whitman, former eBay CEO, has the early lead with 21 percent support, with 54 percent undecided.

Those numbers are for the hypothetical match-ups 460 days from now. Capitol Alert has the exclusive statistical tabulations.

The GOP primary:

Whitman: 21 percent
Campbell: 18 percent
Poizner: 7 percent
Undecided: 54 percent

The Dem primary:

Feinstein: 38 percent
Brown: 16 percent
Villaraigosa: 16 percent
Newsom: 10 percent
Garamendi: 4 percent

Former Controller Steve Westly, schools chief Jack O'Connell and Treasurer Bill Lockyer weigh in at 2 percent or less.

March 4, 2009 - 12:48 pm
NEWS FEED: Calitics

Prop 8 Should Be Struck Down

The California Supreme Court finds itself center stage tomorrow when it will hear oral arguments on whether it should uphold Proposition 8's ban on same-sex marriage.

The case touches the heart of our democracy and poses a profound question: can a bare majority of voters strip away an inalienable right through the initiative process? If so, what possible meaning does the word inalienable have?

The state faced a dilemma like this before. In 1964, 65 percent of California voters approved Proposition 14, which would have legalized racial discrimination in the selling or renting of housing. Both the California and U.S. Supreme Courts struck down this proposition, concluding that it amounted to an unconstitutional denial of rights.

March 4, 2009 - 03:00 am
NEWS FEED: Los Angeles Times

California Supreme Court may reveal stance on Prop. 8 on Thursday

Reporting from San Francisco -- The California Supreme Court may reveal Thursday whether it intends to uphold Proposition 8, and if so, whether an estimated 18,000 same-sex marriages will remain valid, during a high-stakes televised session that has sparked plans for demonstrations throughout the state.

By now, the court already has drafted a decision on the case, with an author and at least three other justices willing to sign it. Oral arguments sometimes result in changes to the draft, but rarely do they change the majority position. The ruling is due in 90 days.

Chief Justice Ronald M. George, who wrote the historic May 15, 2008, decision that gave same-sex couples the right to marry, will be the one to watch during the hearing because he is often in the majority and usually writes the rulings in the most controversial cases.

February 27, 2009 - 10:00 pm
NEWS FEED: Calitics

Friday Open Thread

The best of the rest:

• Former Assemblywoman Nell Soto passed away after a long illness that included much of the 2008 legislative session.  She had been active in state and local politics since the late 1940s.  RIP.

• This is a major ruling from the California Supreme Court on whistleblower protections.  The case involved a low-level employee who reported her superior for violating regulations.  Employees will no longer be subject to retaliation (as the whistleblower in question was) without further sanctions.

• Did you know that the first gubernatorial forum on the Democratic side, kind of, happened this week in Northridge?

• The current Governor has