"Does anyone know if Coffman did in fact have people being paid like Armstrong did?"

- Posted by Money Talks in response to our story "Coffman turns in petition signatures."

Dear Money,

Who cares? Many campaigns use paid circulators and we've never seen the issue actually have an impact on a campaign. In fact, we think one of dumber mistakes a campaign can make is bringing it up. It makes campaigns looks like whiners. The important thing for campaigns is to get access to the ballot. It's really sad when a campaign uses paid circulators, like for example, Marc Holtzman did in 2006, and still can't make the ballot. We don't know how those responsible for that debacle still get work in Colorado.      

"Shari [Williams] was never close to Owens."

- Posted by Anonymous2 in response to our story "Prager to host LPR graduation ceremony."

Dear Anonymous2,

In the old days of the Soviet Union when the Communists wanted to re-write history they sent the owners of books little pieces of paper with the revised text and the book owners were expected to cut them out line by line and paste over the older version of "history." You may send your pieces of paper with your "historical" revisions to:

CPUSA

235 West 23rd Street

New York, NY 10011

"I'm confused a bit from reading your post. Why is Dobson not considered sufficiently ‘prolife'"

-Posted by Steven in response to our story "Paradise Lost."

Dear Steven,

Dobson was attacked last year by a group of pro-lifers, lead by Colorado Right to Life, who thought that he wasn't hard line enough. We know that seems incredible to you. It seemed incredible to most pro-lifers too. National Right to Life read Colorado Right to Life out of the national organization in part because of it.

"Come out from behind this ridiculous pseudonym."

- Posted by conservativeincolorado in response to our story "Paradise Lost."

Dear conservativeincolorado,

We kind of like our ridiculous pseudonym. We can't say the same thing about yours. It's not even creative enough to qualify for ridiculous. It's bland, blah and boring. Which bring us to your post: Why didn't you use your name on it? Is your MO going to political websites and using anonymous posts to try to discredit writers who you don't agree with? For shame!