My post last weekend on the Globe's comments section generated, amusingly, 138 comments. Apparently, bloggers and blog readers like to talk about nothing so much as blogging!
Anyway, here's an interesting postscript to the whole topic. The Globe is right now running an in-depth seven-part series on Ted Kennedy, from his childhood to (this Sunday) the present day. Today's installment: Chappaquiddick. One can only imagine what the commentariat at the Globe would be saying about that.
But indeed, one can only imagine. Because the Globe is not allowing comments on any of the Kennedy stories. Why? Because the Kennedy stories are not "news," but rather a retrospective? But why should matter? Because they're afraid that the comments will be overwhelmingly negative? But surely that would defeat the purpose of allowing comments in the first place.