Ohio: Ohio Supreme Court

June 1, 2009 - 01:24 pm
NEWS FEED: Columbus Dispatch

Inmate to die for burning woman to death in trunk

Daniel Wilson let Lutz out briefly before he ordered her back in the trunk, set the gas tank on fire and left her to die.

It was the second time Wilson walked away from someone who would die as a result of his actions.

Wilson, now 39, faces execution Wednesday for Lutz' 1991 death in Elyria, west of Cleveland.

Wilson has asked Gov. Ted Strickland for mercy, although the Ohio Parole Board has recommended that Strickland not grant clemency.

The Ohio Supreme Court on Friday rejected Wilson's latest request to delay his execution.

Events leading to Lutz's death began May 3, 1991, when she went with an old boyfriend and Wilson, whom she had recently met, to the Empire Tavern in Elyria.

March 26, 2009 - 12:55 pm
NEWS FEED: Columbus Dispatch

State justices toss case on breath alcohol test

The Ohio Supreme Court threw out a case brought last week by Jessica Derov of Warren, who
disputed the validity of a breath test that found her to be driving under the influence. Derov's
case could have had implications for the state's new breath-testing device, the Intoxilyzer 8000,
which has drawn challenges even before it's used in the state.

The Supreme Court decided against even considering that question.

In its decision to throw out Derov's case, the court said there wasn't enough information for it
to weigh the validity of the test used on Derov -- much less the Intoxilyzer, which is a different
instrument.

The Intoxilyzer 8000 was supposed to debut in a pilot program in Clermont County early this
year, but it's still not in use, said Tom Hunter, spokesman for the Ohio Department of Public
Safety.

-- James Nash

jnash@dispatch.com

March 18, 2009 - 03:11 pm
NEWS FEED: Columbus Dispatch

State's top court won't delay killer's execution

COLUMBUS -- The Ohio Supreme Court has denied a condemned killer's request to
delay his execution to allow him to challenge the state's method of execution.

Brett Hartman wanted time to join a lawsuit pending in Franklin County that claims
the state's method of lethal injection is unconstitutional.

Hartman says the method will deny him a quick and painless death as required by
Ohio law.

The state Supreme Court today rejected Hartman's request, which was made in a
court filing last week in Columbus.

Hartman is scheduled to die April 7 for the fatal stabbing and mutilation of
46-year-old Wanda Snipes in Akron on Sept. 9, 1997.

Hartman says he's innocent and also plans to ask Gov. Ted Strickland for a delay
to allow testing of additional evidence.

March 4, 2009 - 08:04 am
NEWS FEED: Columbus Dispatch

Electing judges often results in a political taint

The reality version of The Appeal concerns Don Blankenship, chief executive officer of A.T. Massey Coal Co., who almost single-handedly changed the composition of the West Virginia Supreme Court by supporting Brent Benjamin against incumbent Chief Justice Warner McGraw. Blankenship started his quest after a jury rendered a $50 million verdict against Massey Coal in favor of Hugh Caperton and his company, Harmon Mining.

Blankenship contributed $2.5 million to a political action committee that viewed McGraw as too soft on crime and too dangerous for kids, and spent $500,000 on advertising. Altogether, Blankenship spent three times what Benjamin's own committee spent. A year before the Massey case came before the court, Benjamin was seated as its new chief justice.

March 4, 2009 - 07:34 am
NEWS FEED: Columbus Dispatch

U.S. justices seem ready to set rules for disqualifying judges

The case argued before the Supreme Court involves a high-stakes election so riveting that novelist John Grisham used its underpinnings for the best-selling book The Appeal.

The case involves $3 million spent by a West Virginia coal executive to help elect a state Supreme Court justice who, after taking the bench, was a crucial vote in overturning a $50 million-plus verdict against the company.

But a ruling by the Supreme Court could shape state judicial races nationwide, including often-expensive Ohio Supreme Court elections.

One indication of the importance of the outcome: Among those filing legal briefs in an attempt to sway the ruling were Ohio Supreme Court Justice Evelyn Lundberg Stratton and Ohio Citizen Action, a nonpartisan advocacy group.

March 3, 2009 - 02:34 pm
NEWS FEED: Columbus Dispatch

When does campaign gift taint justice?

WASHINGTON -- Like at least four other members of the U.S. Supreme Court this morning, Justice John Paul Stevens seemed to be searching for how to define when a slew of campaign spending or other benefits results in an appearance of bias and requires a judge to step aside to ensure a fair trial.

The case argued before the Supreme Court involves a high-stakes election so riveting that novelist John Grisham used its underpinnings to shape the best selling book, The Appeal.

The case involves some $3 million spent by a West Virginia coal company executive to help elect a West Virginia Supreme Court justice who after taking the bench was the crucial vote in overturning a $50 million-plus verdict against the company.

March 1, 2009 - 06:34 am
NEWS FEED: Columbus Dispatch

Donations vs. impartiality on docket

The insurance giant also contributed $75,000 last year to an independent group, Partnership for Ohio's Future, that produced feel-good advertisements promoting the candidacies of Stratton and another justice.

Now, a U.S. Supreme Court case could determine whether such largesse -- routine in Ohio and other states with elected supreme courts -- has so much influence over the dispensers of justice that they can't fairly decide cases involving those contributors.

That would be bad for Stratton -- and for State Farm.

Since Stratton joined the state's top court in 1996, she has ruled for the company in 15 cases and against it in one.

The company has one case pending before the Ohio Supreme Court that could determine whether it must pay the medical expenses of accident victims under its uninsured-motorist policies.

February 25, 2009 - 08:15 pm
NEWS FEED: Buckeye State Blog

ProgressOhio: "If Jennifer Brunner isn't willing to ignore the law and play our partisan games, she's a coward!"

In 2006, a group of conservatives, including an RNC member/lawyer from PA, attempted to save the Blackwell for Governor campaign from itself and the outrage of Ohio voters disgusted with Republican rule in Ohio by challenging the legitimacy of Governor Ted Strickland, and thus, ultimately his eligibility to be sworn into office.

At the time, I said that purely as a matter of law the elections statute's standard for what can constitute as a "residency" was so flexible, that it's a stretch to say there was any legal basis for the complaint.

ProgressOhio has been pushing the State Senator Jon Husted story hard.  I've only said that people like Bizzyblog who were so quick with the felony allegations when it was Strickland are showing their partisan nonsense with their utter silence on Husted.

February 20, 2009 - 10:23 am
NEWS FEED: Buckeye State Blog

An open letter to all 2010 U.S. Senate Democratic candidates

The Preamble of the Ohio Democratic Party's Constitution and Bylaws of 2007 states, that our party is organized to "sustain and advance the principles of democracy" and that one of the essential tenets of our party is that "We believe that there is no substitute for fair and equal representation and strong public participation in a government chose by election."

And yet, despite that being one of the fundamental principles of the Ohio Democratic Party, Chapter 9 of that same documents says:

"In any election year in which any statewide office . . . are to appear on the ballot, the Executive Committee shall be called for a meeting before the primary election and must carefully consider in each race the endorsement of one of more persons.

February 20, 2009 - 10:23 am
NEWS FEED: Buckeye State Blog

An open letter to all '10 U.S. Senate Democratic candidates

The Preamble of the Ohio Democratic Party's Constitution and Bylaws of 2007 states, that our party is organized to "sustain and advance the principles of democracy" and that one of the essential tenets of our party is that "We believe that there is no substitute for fair and equal representation and strong public participation in a government chose by election."

And yet, despite that being one of the fundamental principles of the Ohio Democratic Party, Chapter 9 of that same documents says:

"In any election year in which any statewide office . . . are to appear on the ballot, the Executive Committee shall be called for a meeting before the primary election and must carefully consider in each race the endorsement of one of more persons.