The Washington Post’s Rachel Dry explains why Clinton and Obama’s relative positions on Iraq could make all the difference on March 4.

“Greenfield said yesterday that he was backing Obama over Hillary Clinton because Obama had been against the war in Iraq from ‘day one.’ That's an argument that could play particularly well in Vermont, where last year dozens of towns approved a call to investigate impeaching President Bush and Vice President Cheney for misleading the nation into the Iraq war. And this year, voters in Brattleboro can go from casting their primary ballots to considering whether the town itself should draft ‘indictments against President Bush and Vice President Cheney for crimes against our Constitution.”