July 30, 2008 - 20:14

June, July money races at a glance

Because of the delayed reporting date for July, in accordance with the seismic changes in the Public Disclosure Commission's website this summer, June's and July's entries in PolitickerWA.com's money races at a glance series have been combined into one post.

The first number listed is contributions, the second number is expenditures and the third number is the difference between the two. Precluding any unusual circumstances, that third number in bold is equal to cash on hand. The candidate with the most cash on hand is listed at the top of each section. Asterisk denotes incumbent.

With the exception of the gubernatorial and attorney general races, in-kind contributions were ignored and significant campaign loans and personal candidate contributions have been noted in parentheses where applicable.

See April's figures here, and May's figures here.

 

Governor
*Chris Gregoire (D): $8,502,000 - $4,285,000 = $4,217,000
Dino Rossi (R): $6,655,000 - $3,020,000 = $3,635,000

Attorney general
*Rob McKenna: $1,178,000 - $611,000 = $567,000
John Ladenburg: $331,000 - $207,000 = $124,000

Commissioner of public lands
Peter Goldmark (D): $491,000 - $187,000 = $304,000
*Doug Sutherland(R): $397,000 - $119,000 = $278,000

State treasurer
Chang Mook Sohn(D): $197,000 - $66,000 = $131,000
Allan Martin(R): $60,000 - $15,000 = $45,000
Jim McIntire(D): $150,000 - $135,000 = $15,000 (spent $45,000 on a radio ad buy on Monday)

Superintendent of public instruction
*Terry Bergeson: $143,000 - $86,000 = $57,000
Randy Dorn: $64,000 - $34,000 = $30,000

Pierce County executive
Calvin Goings (D): $221,000 - $74,000 = $147,000
Shawn Bunney (R): $245,000 - $114,000 = $131,000
Pat McCarthy (D): $67,000 - $53,000 = $14,000
Mike Lonergan (I): $30,000 - $14,000 = $16,000 (includes $20,000 loan)

6th Legislative District, position 1
*Don Barlow (D): $55,000 - $32,000 = $23,000
Mel Lindauer (R): $47,000 - $26,000 = $21,000
Kevin Parker (R): $69,000 - $50,000 = $19,000

7th Legislative District, position 1
Sue Lani Madsen (R): $18,000 - $11,000 = $7,000
Shelly Short (R): $37,000 - $31,000 = $6,000
Peter Davenport: $12,000 - $3,000 = $9,000 (includes $9500 loan)

8th Legislative District, position 1
Carol Moser (D): $47,000 - $23,000 = $24,000
Steve Simmons (R):  $12,000 - $3,000 = $9,000
Skip Novakovich (R): $24,000 - $19,000 = $5,000 (includes $15,000 loan)

10th Legislative District senate
*Mary Margaret Haugen (D): $126,000 - $57,000 = $69,000
Linda Haddon (R): $52,000 - $13,000 = $39,000

14th Legislative District, position 1
Vickie Ybarra (D): $33,000 - $21,000 = $12,000
Norm Johnson (R): $22,000 - $20,000 = $2,000
Bob McLaughlin (R): $13,000 - $12,000 = $1,000 (includes $2,000 loan)

17th Legislative District, position 1
Tim Probst (D): $58,000 - $30,000 = $28,000
Joseph James (R): $77,000 - $71,000 = $6,000
*Jim Dunn (R): No report

18th Legislative District, position 1
*Jaime Herrera (R): $68,000 - $25,000 = $43,000
Vanessa Duplessie (D):$ 42,000 - $37,000 = $5,000

26th Legislative District, position 1
Kim Abel (D): $45,000 - $22,000 = $23,000
Jan Angel (R): $54,000 - $33,000 = $21,000

26th Legislative District, position 2
*Larry Seaquist (D): $85,000 - $54,000 = $31,000
Marlyn Jensen (R): $28,000 - $18,000 = $10,000

30th Legislative District, position 1
Carol Gregory (D): $ 43,000 - $24,000 = $19,000
*Skip Priest (R): $46,000 - $31,000 = $15,000

35th Legislative District, position 2
Herb Baze (R): $40,000 - $6,000 = $34,000 (includes $15,000 loan)
Fred Finn (D): $90,000 -$ 75,000 = $15,000 (includes $25,000 personal contribution)
Daryl Daugs (D): $29,000 - $24,000 = $5,000
Randy Neatherlin (R): $19,000 - $15,000 = $4,000

36th Legislative District, position 1
Reuven Carlyle (D): $153,000 - $60,000 = $93,000 (includes $4,000 loan and $10,000 personal contribution)
John Burbank (D): $118,000 - $63,000 = $55,000

39th Legislative District senate
*Val Stevens (R): $113,000 - $62,000 = $71,000
Fred Walser (D): $51,000 - $35,000 = $16,000

40th Legislative District senate
Kevin Ranker (D): $59,000 - $29,000 = $30,000
Ken Henderson (D): $52,000 - $23,000 = $29,000
Steve Van Luven (R): $21,000 - $2,000 = $19,000

41st Legislative District, position 1
Marcie Maxwell (D): $82,000 - $43,000 = $39,000
Steve Litzow (R): $103,000 - $66,000 = $37,000

46th Legislative District, position 1
Scott White (D): $69,000 - $42,000 = $27,000
Gerry Pollet (D): $37,000 - $14,000 = $23,000

 

Bryan Bissell is a PolitickerWA.com Reporter and can be reached via email at noreply@politicker.com.

Comments

Get Your Prom Dress Before


Get Your Prom Dress Before the New Year!
It's barely autumn, and the winter holidays seem to be a long way away. You are getting into a routine of back-to-school: homework, tests, friends, activities, and sports. With the possible exception of college planning, next spring is probably the last thing on your mind. Why should you start thinking about a Prom Dresses when the prom is so far away?

It is not well-known by most prom-goers, that the best selections are found prior to the New Year. Prom Dresses manufacturers are already shipping Sexy Dresses to the stores in October for the upcoming prom season. By the time the prom magazines hit the news stands in December, many people will already have placed orders of Sexy Dresses for the most popular dresses. How do they come across these new designs of Prom Dresses that have yet to be in the magazines? People start searching online. As soon as manufacturer photos become available, it's no surprise to find many internet Prom Dresses retailers adding new styles on their websites in early October.

You might say, "The prom is months away in May! Isn't March enough time to find a Prom Dresses?" If you are not wanting anything in particular, the answer is yes. If you have your heart set on a particular style or color, you may be disappointed if you wait.

Why would they vanish in this way? This is because prom dresses are a very seasonal product. Manufacturers cut a certain number of dresses intended for the following spring season in late summer, and they start shipping them to stores in October. Based on initial sales, the manufacturers will tailor the more popular styles starting in February or March. By then, the stores have pending orders for these styles. Production of more Prom Dresses stops after this happens. No one wants unsold prom dresses sitting in their warehouses all summer! It is possible that some styles may be suitable for homecoming in fall, but most of the time, even they are not available until at least summer.

Many schools have winter formals in December, January, and February, which is why the most popular dresses could be sold out or on back order that early. Because Prom Dresses are on the racks early, many of them are purchased for these earlier events. Also keep in mind that Prom Dress makers sell worldwide, not just to American consumers. Many online prom dress retailers sell globally, as well. The competition for the most popular dresses is intense.

10/09/09 4:28 am

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <p> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.