August 11, 2008 - 16:22

Eek, an income tax!

Only six other states don't have one. And why not?

The first call for an income tax came in 1929 - during the first Progressive era. Although it passed the legislature, it was shot down by the state Supreme Court, and the B&O tax on business receipts was created in its place.

Later, in a 2002 report to the Legislature, a panel headed by Bill Gates Sr. listed all of the advantages of a state income tax, including:

  • it's deductible from federal taxable income for those who itemize;
  • it provides for growth in tax revenues commensurate with the growth in the demand for state government services;
  • it allows a more progressive tax system;
  • it is based on one measure of ability to pay − income;
  • it is efficient because it has a broad base and a low rate;
  • it allows for a more competitive tax structure relative to other states; and
  • it would allow a reduction in our very high and very regressive property tax.

That report to the legislature was promptly shelved, and discussion of an income tax continues to be a legislative taboo. Why? Because it's political suicide.

In the theater of politics, the expedient and the easy often trumps the realistic and the necessary. And that's why no one - especially not Governor Chris Gregoire - will be advocating for a Washington income tax anytime soon.

And we will continue to balance the budget on a regressive, unstable, two-legged stool.

Wally Edge can be reached via email at noreply@politicker.com.

Comments

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <p> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <br>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.